Auction 75 - Rare and Important Items
Leaf Handwritten by the Haflaa – Novellae on the Laws of Kashrut – With an Unpublished Passage
Opening: $12,000
Estimate: $15,000 - $20,000
Sold for: $30,000
Including buyer's premium
Leaf (two written pages, 54 lines) handwritten by R. Pinchas HaLevi Horowitz Rabbi of Frankfurt am Main, author of the Haflaa – novellae on Shulchan Aruch Yoreh De'ah pertaining to the laws of Kashrut, sections 101 and 105.
Most of the contents of this leaf were published in Chiddushei Haflaa (Munkacs 1895), after undergoing minor editing. The two final lines of the first page, as well as the first line and several words from the second line at the beginning of the second page, were not printed there (and were presumably not printed anywhere else).
This leaf is part of a manuscript which was in the possession of R. Efraim Zalman Horowitz of Komarno, great-grandson of the Haflaa. In 1895, R. Efraim Zalman entrusted R. Sender Chaim of Kozova with the manuscript, to transcribe it for publication. In their enthusiastic approbations to the book, prominent rabbis and rebbes such as the Darchei Teshuvah of Munkacs and the Maharsham of Berezhany attest to this. The Darchei Teshuva describes the preeminence of this manuscript in his approbation: " What shall I testify and to what shall I compare the great value of the manuscript, which although short, revives my soul".
R. Pinchas HaLevi Ish Horowitz, rabbi of Frankfurt am Main, author of the Haflaa (1731-1805), served in his early years as rabbi of Witkowo and Lachovice. On 26th Tevet 1772, he was appointed rabbi and dean of Frankfurt am Main, which at that time was the largest Torah center in Germany. He held this position for over thirty-three years, until his passing. He edified many disciples in his yeshiva, the most prominent of them being his close disciple the Chatam Sofer. He led the battles against Haskalah and the Reform movement. R. Pinchas and his Torah novellae were held in high regard by all the leaders of his generation, whether Chassidic or opponents of Chassidut.?At the end of 1771, shortly before he arrived in Frankfurt, R. Pinchas spent several weeks together with his brother R. Shmelke Rabbi of Nikolsburg, by the Maggid of Mezeritch, where they absorbed the secrets of Torah and worship of G-d from the Maggid and his leading disciples (the Mitteler Rebbe of Lubavitch relates to this in his famous foreword to Shulchan Aruch HaRav, first printed in 1814). The Tzemach Tzedek of Lubavitch defines R. Pinchas as a disciple of the Maggid (Likutei Torah, Bamidbar, Zhitomir 1848, p. 29b, in a gloss on the words of his grandfather the Baal HaTanya). In his book Panim Yafot, the Haflaa brings several principles from the teachings of the Maggid of Mezeritch (see: Erchei HaHaflaa, Jerusalem 2006, I, pp. 40-41), although he only mentions him explicitly in one place, in Parashat Beshalach (p. 57b), in the commentary to "Vayavo'u Marata" (some claim that the omission of the name of the Maggid from the book Panim Yafot is the fault of the copyists of the manuscript. In his foreword, the publisher R. Efraim Zalman Margolies states that Panim Yafot was not printed based on the author's own manuscript, but from a transcription produced by one of the grandsons of the author, "based on a transcription of the book produced by various scribes", meaning that the book was printed based on a third hand copy. This claim still does not explain the fact that the name of the Maggid of Mezeritch is not mentioned in any of the books published by the Haflaa in his lifetime, even in places where the ideas quoted were derived from the teachings of the Maggid). During his short stay by the Maggid, the Haflaa drew close to several disciples of the Maggid, including the Baal HaTanya, R. Zusha of Anipoli and R. Avraham of Kalisk (whom the Haflaa referred to, in 1792, with great reverence: "my beloved friend, the great luminary, R. Avraham HaKohen of Tiberias"). In a letter he wrote in 1792, he expresses his esteem for the Chassidim of Tiberias who devote themselves to the worship of G-d in the Holy Land (Yeshurun, XXI, p. 855).
The Haflaa was a prolific author, and he recorded many novellae on all parts of the Torah and on most Talmudic tractates. He gave the general title of "Haflaa" to all his books. The first book of this series, on Tractate Ketubot, was named Ketubah (Offenbach 1787), and the second, on Tractate Kiddushin, was named HaMikneh (Offenbach 1801). Both were published in his lifetime, while the third part in this series, Panim Yafot on the Torah in five volumes (Ostroh 1825-1826), was only published after his passing. His halachic responsa were published in Responsa Givat Pinchas.
Publication of the novellae of the Haflaa on other Talmudic tractates and on Shulchan Aruch, including the contents of the present leaf, began in 1895. In 1900, three additional parts on the Talmud were published in Vilna based on the manuscripts of the Haflaa, and in 1994, two further volumes were published. The Vilna printers write in their foreword that the three volumes on the Talmud they published are based on two manuscripts of the Haflaa which they received, "and both manuscripts of the Haflaa testify to each other, since they were both written by the same scribe". One of the two manuscripts was received from R. Efraim Zalman Horowitz, who also inherited the present manuscript.
[1] leaf (two written pages). 19 cm. Good-fair condition. Stains, dampstains. Marginal tears, not affecting text.
Most of the contents of this leaf were published in Chiddushei Haflaa (Munkacs 1895), after undergoing minor editing. The two final lines of the first page, as well as the first line and several words from the second line at the beginning of the second page, were not printed there (and were presumably not printed anywhere else).
This leaf is part of a manuscript which was in the possession of R. Efraim Zalman Horowitz of Komarno, great-grandson of the Haflaa. In 1895, R. Efraim Zalman entrusted R. Sender Chaim of Kozova with the manuscript, to transcribe it for publication. In their enthusiastic approbations to the book, prominent rabbis and rebbes such as the Darchei Teshuvah of Munkacs and the Maharsham of Berezhany attest to this. The Darchei Teshuva describes the preeminence of this manuscript in his approbation: " What shall I testify and to what shall I compare the great value of the manuscript, which although short, revives my soul".
R. Pinchas HaLevi Ish Horowitz, rabbi of Frankfurt am Main, author of the Haflaa (1731-1805), served in his early years as rabbi of Witkowo and Lachovice. On 26th Tevet 1772, he was appointed rabbi and dean of Frankfurt am Main, which at that time was the largest Torah center in Germany. He held this position for over thirty-three years, until his passing. He edified many disciples in his yeshiva, the most prominent of them being his close disciple the Chatam Sofer. He led the battles against Haskalah and the Reform movement. R. Pinchas and his Torah novellae were held in high regard by all the leaders of his generation, whether Chassidic or opponents of Chassidut.?At the end of 1771, shortly before he arrived in Frankfurt, R. Pinchas spent several weeks together with his brother R. Shmelke Rabbi of Nikolsburg, by the Maggid of Mezeritch, where they absorbed the secrets of Torah and worship of G-d from the Maggid and his leading disciples (the Mitteler Rebbe of Lubavitch relates to this in his famous foreword to Shulchan Aruch HaRav, first printed in 1814). The Tzemach Tzedek of Lubavitch defines R. Pinchas as a disciple of the Maggid (Likutei Torah, Bamidbar, Zhitomir 1848, p. 29b, in a gloss on the words of his grandfather the Baal HaTanya). In his book Panim Yafot, the Haflaa brings several principles from the teachings of the Maggid of Mezeritch (see: Erchei HaHaflaa, Jerusalem 2006, I, pp. 40-41), although he only mentions him explicitly in one place, in Parashat Beshalach (p. 57b), in the commentary to "Vayavo'u Marata" (some claim that the omission of the name of the Maggid from the book Panim Yafot is the fault of the copyists of the manuscript. In his foreword, the publisher R. Efraim Zalman Margolies states that Panim Yafot was not printed based on the author's own manuscript, but from a transcription produced by one of the grandsons of the author, "based on a transcription of the book produced by various scribes", meaning that the book was printed based on a third hand copy. This claim still does not explain the fact that the name of the Maggid of Mezeritch is not mentioned in any of the books published by the Haflaa in his lifetime, even in places where the ideas quoted were derived from the teachings of the Maggid). During his short stay by the Maggid, the Haflaa drew close to several disciples of the Maggid, including the Baal HaTanya, R. Zusha of Anipoli and R. Avraham of Kalisk (whom the Haflaa referred to, in 1792, with great reverence: "my beloved friend, the great luminary, R. Avraham HaKohen of Tiberias"). In a letter he wrote in 1792, he expresses his esteem for the Chassidim of Tiberias who devote themselves to the worship of G-d in the Holy Land (Yeshurun, XXI, p. 855).
The Haflaa was a prolific author, and he recorded many novellae on all parts of the Torah and on most Talmudic tractates. He gave the general title of "Haflaa" to all his books. The first book of this series, on Tractate Ketubot, was named Ketubah (Offenbach 1787), and the second, on Tractate Kiddushin, was named HaMikneh (Offenbach 1801). Both were published in his lifetime, while the third part in this series, Panim Yafot on the Torah in five volumes (Ostroh 1825-1826), was only published after his passing. His halachic responsa were published in Responsa Givat Pinchas.
Publication of the novellae of the Haflaa on other Talmudic tractates and on Shulchan Aruch, including the contents of the present leaf, began in 1895. In 1900, three additional parts on the Talmud were published in Vilna based on the manuscripts of the Haflaa, and in 1994, two further volumes were published. The Vilna printers write in their foreword that the three volumes on the Talmud they published are based on two manuscripts of the Haflaa which they received, "and both manuscripts of the Haflaa testify to each other, since they were both written by the same scribe". One of the two manuscripts was received from R. Efraim Zalman Horowitz, who also inherited the present manuscript.
[1] leaf (two written pages). 19 cm. Good-fair condition. Stains, dampstains. Marginal tears, not affecting text.
Chassidut – Letters and Manuscripts
Chassidut – Letters and Manuscripts